"If you complete this task, you will get the corresponding contribution value. So can this contribution value be used like currency?"

Sociologists point to restaurants on the street:

"For example, now you go to a restaurant and pay for the contribution value."

"Oh, we're not like that."

Guide:

"If you want to eat, if you don't cook by yourself, you have to place an order in the 'eat' category through the wish system, and then either choose to deliver the meal to your door, or you go to a designated restaurant to eat, or even the system will arrange for you to eat at someone else's house - if someone else takes on the task of 'cooking for you' and is willing to have dinner with you, you can go to someone else's house to eat."

"Is this how?"

The sociologist and other inspectors looked at each other:

"I understand, this contribution value cannot be used as currency and circulating. It can only be tied to the system."

"Yes, this contribution value can only be used in the system. It cannot be circulated or monetized."

The guide stated.

"This system belongs to the country, right?"

Sociologist asked.

The wizard nodded.

The economist interrupted:

"In this way, it seems to be somewhat similar to the planned economy, but it does not plan to the terminal, but only focuses on market prices and the rules of the entire industry."

"Yes, all industry rules are designed by the state and reflected in the contribution value."

The sociologist added.

When eating someone else's meal, the system will deduct personal contribution value. When someone else takes on a task and provides you with a meal, the system will receive the system's reward contribution value.

All of this is the system that calculates the contribution value, and the rules are decided by the system.

"In this way, its resource integration is not only high, but also fully follows people-oriented and does what you need!"

After the economist said that, he asked the guide with a little curiousness:

"Is there a proportional relationship between the amount of rice and the contribution value? For example, if I eat one bowl of rice, I will deduct 5 contribution values, and if I eat two bowls of rice, I will deduct 10 contribution values. Is that true?"

"This has no proportional relationship. Take food as an example. One meal is full and good, it is just a task. After completion, it is 5 contribution values, and I don't care about how much you eat."

Guide.

"Ah? Then isn't this just a loophole? If the guy who takes on this task meets a big foodie, will he lose his life?"

The economist said with his eyes wide open.

"The contribution value given in the system cannot be changed, and it is also a reference. Both parties can negotiate and then make up for it based on the actual situation."

Guide:

"For example, for a meal, the system sets the contribution value to 5 points. As a result, you are a big eater and eat more than normal people. So the person who takes the task is definitely not happy and will discuss it with you. Then you give 3 appropriate points, so that the person who takes the task will get 8 contribution points, and you will be deducted 8 contribution points."

The economist nodded and understood:

"This contribution value will play the role of currency settlement at this time."

At this time, it was the sociologist's turn to have questions:

"If the food market is completely opened, anyone can participate in it and anyone can take on the food task, then wouldn't the restaurant be forced to withdraw from the market?"

"No. It will just decrease, but it won't disappear."

The guide replied:

"Because there are different options in experience, there are always people who need this kind of experience. Moreover, restaurants have obvious advantages in solving the task of eating multiple people."

The economist nodded and praised:

"This means opening up the catering industry, and anyone can participate, which provides employment opportunities."

"But in this way, the quality is unreliable!"

Sociologists disagree:

"If you don't pass a quality inspection, you will go to the market. This is a huge risk!"

The sociologist's words stunned the economist.
Chapter completed!