"Front", the Italians named it "Rotating Winger". The Argentinians call it "Blower".

Why can this kind of role only be imagined and unspeakable? Because you cannot describe its exact position to define his name on the field. Count the names of each position on the field, whether it is a deep-lying organization, a nine-and-a-half, or an attacking forward.

, column center, wing midfielder, etc., all have a large frame or three-dimensional depiction, but this role does not.

Why is this character mysterious?

Because most head coaches can't describe it clearly. When dealing with the outside world, they just talk about some cliché positions in a very formulaic way, and reporters are unwilling to write about them even though they are brilliant. Because readers will think that they are fooling people, just like Cruyff would tell reporters in private.

It is said that he played in the 312211 formation, but would the reporter write that in the newspaper? If he actually wrote it, readers would just laugh at the reporter as an idiot.

Just like some teams start with 451, but when defending, at the last line of defense, you will find that there are 6 people lined up. Is this a 4-back formation?

This kind of "change of front" has become an invisible but crucial force in the tactical competition in the football circle. After 1974, teams that wanted to imitate, such as the Brazilian team, were unable to do so at the cost of 10 years of failure.

.

It's too difficult. You can't train such players full-time, because it will become a double-edged sword, which may destroy the entire tactical system. Also, because it cannot become mainstream, no team will focus on building such players.

England's goal, from start to finish, Ashley Cole assisted, and then provided an assist to Beckham in the midfielder area.

However, if you think about it, why is he there? Why doesn't he support McManaman from the wing? That is the responsibility of his full-back!

If Ashley Cole plays this way throughout the game, throughout the season, and throughout his career, can he still be a surprise player every time? Or will he become a cancer in the tactical system?

It is precisely because there are too many factors at play that "changing the front" cannot become the mainstream, and it can only shine under certain circumstances.

In the past 20 years of world competitions, whether it is the European Cup or the World Cup, this "changing forward" has become an invisible force driving the evolution of football tactics. There are even some self-contained 3-back formations that are derived from

this.

In modern times, "changing forwards" has always been the pursuit of top coaches. Once it can be used well, it will be miraculous. For example, in the last game between Argentina and Nigeria, who was the only shot in the penalty area before Argentina scored?

Solin, a midfielder and wide player, broke into the penalty area and came to the forward area to shoot. Unfortunately, it was only once, which shows that Argentina is not proficient in the use of changing forwards.

In 2006, when Lahm scored the first goal in the opening game of the World Cup, he got the ball from the wing, then cut inside and passed two people, and completed a long-range shot in the area between the midfielder and the winger. It was also that time.

In the World Cup, the amazing Grosso, when Italy faced Australia with one less player, went forward without hesitation. He got the ball in the winger area and started to work as a forward. Finally, after passing one person in the penalty area, he was defeated by Nigeria.

I tripped and he was nowhere near the goal

No more than 10 yards. Under normal circumstances, it can be said that a player has a flash of inspiration, but if you think about it carefully, in the World Cup, there is one less player. At the last moment of the game, Italy has to rely on a full-back to rush up and do the work of the forward. This is very special.

Did Rosso get the best of him, or did Lippi have the tact to maximize the essence of changing forwards? Thinking about it on the other hand, without Lippi's nod, would Grosso have the courage to rush forward? And he wouldn't pass the ball to the forward.

Working alone?

In the final analysis, the emergence of "changing forwards" is a compromise in which football has reached a realistic bottleneck but cannot pursue the highest level.

The Dutch concept of total offense and total defense in which everyone can play as a forward and everyone can switch to a defender and perform whatever duties they stand in is too free and the creativity is too amazing. It is simply a dream and an extreme, but in reality

That is, players are not gods. Players must be given a framework.

Only with these shackles can a team of 11 players run smoothly. If 10,000 teams pursue the highest ideal of total offense and total defense, there will only be 9,999 collapses, and what is left?

Called the Netherlands, its highest achievement is the World Cup runner-up, gaining the honor of being the uncrowned king.

But within the rigid framework, the techniques and tactics would be unoriginal and too predictable. Therefore, there was a change of striker, the German team's later famous free man, the rise of the modern winger, and the emergence of modern wingers.

With the emergence of lagging organizations, there are various creations that can only explode at a certain point, a certain person, and a certain position. This is a compromise between reality and ideals, but every change still has a huge impact on modern football.

.

Aldridge's research, experimentation, and application of forward changes have already begun. However, because this kind of change forward has never been mainstream and is not a role that can be routinely created, it can only be used on the spot in a suitable game background, as the Europeans say.

As I said, the focus is changing. If it becomes a rigid and fixed routine, what is the meaning of the change? What is the point of the unexpected change?

He has used it before at Millwall. The earliest key use can be traced back to the first year of the Champions League. Facing Juventus' last-minute struggle, Schneider pressed forward, giving up the wing and going inside to create opportunities.

The goal that opened Millwall and defeated Juventus came from this.

Since then, Zambrotta and Schneider's performances in many critical battles have had the shadow of this change of direction. Because Zambrotta has stronger physical fitness, Zambrotta is more outstanding, which is why he can
Chapter completed!