And Gu Cheng, who has the gift of the parallel world in his head, really doesn't feel that he is any different than his opponent. This is the pride of a time traveler.

Li Lan and Wang Jun on the side also heard the content on the phone. This is the problem with this phablet. It excessively pursues the feature of loud volume and has not yet shifted its focus and features to privacy and confidentiality. This is also the era.

limits.

"Is everything okay? Orange?"

Li Lan asked worriedly, and then complained with some indignation,

"Are these people too idle? I've also read your book. There's no sense of good or evil. Why would they attack you suddenly? And I didn't offend him. I'm really full."

Wang Jun on the other hand was not shocked by this incident. Although the literary world may sound relatively high-end, it is generally a gathering place for a group of people. Where there are people, there are interests, and where there are interests, there are differences.

, this is inevitable.

"It's nothing big. I can handle it. Wang Jun, just sit here for a while. Li Lan will help take care of the child. I'll go to the study first."

Gu Cheng first spoke to comfort his two friends who were worried about him, and then walked straight to the study.

After opening his work computer, Gu Cheng first looked at the email. Sure enough, there was a forwarded message from the publishing house that he had just received. He clicked on it and looked at the content. It was the review that Yu Qi said.

""How to View the Concept of Good and Evil in Murder on the Orient Express", author, Wen Yuanhua."

This name is somewhat famous in China. Gu Cheng once read one of his books called "The Shore of Green Fields". The content discussed the in-depth reading of human nature and the analysis of emotions. Generally speaking, it can be regarded as a

He is a famous writer who has been famous for a long time, but he still doesn’t have much clue as to why he is publishing an article attacking him now. After all, the two people belong to completely different fields. He is a mystery novelist, while the other person is a serious novelist.

Gu Cheng, who was puzzled, decided to put this problem aside for the time being, clicked on the email, and read the entire article at a glance.

The previous ones are all nonsense. I read an article from a friend. With the strong recommendation of the friend, I started reading this most popular mystery novel recently. After spending a few days, I finally read this book.

That's it. I have some opinions and questions about the content inside. I want to discuss it with the public with the help of this platform.

After seeing these contents, Gu Cheng didn't think there was anything wrong. This was basically the beginning of many reviews, but as he continued reading, he became a little angry.

“I didn’t really dabble in detective novels before, but I just started reading Murder on the Orient Express recently. I thought it was a really good work, and the plots in it are interlocking. It is really the best mystery novel in the past twenty years!

It’s just that the protagonist of Murder on the Orient Express helped the murderer cover up the crime. I was naive and would have thought that the evildoers deserved what they deserved before reading this book. But after reading the whole book, I began to think about what is wrong.

Justice, subjective justice and procedural justice. The murder on the Orient Express is tantamount to lynching. This kind of murder without personal responsibility for so-called justice makes me feel horrified.

I don’t know how everyone understands this murder? How do you view the plot in which the protagonist covers up the murderer? Are you happy? Or are you as shuddering as me? Why?”

This is really a man of letters who kills without a knife. After reading the whole article, I feel that it is a good old-timer, asking new writers in the industry, and some of my own views on this book, and there is nothing inappropriate in the wording.

, but to outsiders, they feel that Gu Cheng’s work is promoting a wrong concept of good and evil, completely avoiding the important and ignoring the light. It ignores the background of the article and deliberately converts the situation in it to the modern period.

Gu Cheng sneered twice. People in this world have not experienced the baptism of keyboard warriors, so the words and methods of attacking people are so painless. However, since the other party has already taken action, he cannot passively take the beating.

.

First he sighed, then opened a document and prepared to write a counterattack article to announce his arrival to the literary world of this world.

"I feel deeply honored after reading Senior Wen Yuanhua's questions. As a senior in the literary world, I have also read Mr. Wen Yuanhua's works. I have always admired your works very much. The analysis of emotions in them has given me

A lot of gains.

As for the question you raised, I have only one sentence to answer, that is, the law is just a means to solve problems, and it naturally has its scope of application.

If we want to look at this issue from a legal perspective, we might as well change our thinking and start from a cultural perspective. The time point described in my work is the old era, which was an era just after the world war. In that time and space, a

Human life, especially the life of a scumbag, is worthless. Killing a scumbag is even honorable. The humanitarian concept that every human life is worth cherishing was not as unshakable in that era as it is now. People of that era

Their minds are a little rougher than those of modern people, and they view "death" differently from those of us who have never even killed a chicken.

Many people are even more crude. Lynching, religion, and all kinds of killings can be seen everywhere. Some people even take pleasure in taking other people's lives. I have described these in the article. In the society at that time, some people killed their enemies in public to avenge their fathers.

, and will be praised by newspapers as a filial act, and the government will acquit him.

From this point of view, I feel that how a person's life is valued is determined by society and the environment in which he or she grows up.

So don’t apply the modern concept of “legal morality” to the past time and space, and then speculate on how people in the past felt after killing people. People in the past were much “stronger” than modern people.

Finally, I would like to thank my seniors for their guidance, I really appreciate it."

After Gu Cheng typed out the last word, and then read it from the beginning, he still felt very satisfied with his reply. After all, the other party's words were not so intense. According to the habits of the literary world, he should not be too emotional.

This way of counterattack is just right.

If the other party's response is more intense, Gu Cheng will not be polite anymore. Gu Cheng is still very impressed by Han Han's counterattack article "The literary world is shit, no one should pretend to be X", and it is appropriate to use it to counterattack when the time comes.

Thinking of this, Gu Cheng organized the documents, sent them to Yu Qi, and dialed the other party's number at the same time.
Chapter completed!