341

This incident alarmed Ruthberg for some reason. She suggested that Edward face to face. The reason is very simple. Both sides must face each other head-on to let the other party know that they are powerful, otherwise Dworkin will be more unscrupulous in the future.

Finally he agreed.

The debate was described by the newspaper as a "collision between the extreme views of intellectuals."

This is indeed true. Edward has a bad reputation among the people - except for the LSP group, especially in the mouths of the Southern Conservatives. He is the Fifth Knight of the Apocalypse - porn... because he opposes all forms of early censorship of film and television publications - although this view is actually inconsistent with the spirit of the Constitution, it is too horrifying after all, and it is not an exaggeration to say extremes.

As for Dworkin... "small    dickers" are enough to prove that she is an extreme hater, but strangely, she will sleep with Bolton, so Edward maliciously speculated whether Xiaowang had a high-intensity military titanium pelvis for herself, otherwise the body of Puxin man should not be able to withstand this continuous high-intensity up and down movement.

Edward also knew that the debate with Dworkin was like the previous match with William Barkley Jr., and there was actually no victory or defeat, it was just that both sides promoted their own views.

The location was placed in the Dwight auditorium. First Dworkin came on stage. She slowly adjusted the large-caliber body-barrel artillery. Along with a series of fxxks, she began to vent. The louder she scolded, the more intense the applause and cheers in the audience... Many people were fascinated, as if they were at the scene of a rock concert.

When it was Edward's turn to speak, a large number of women began to shout slogans "Down with porn dealers!" "We don't want to listen to porn lawyers" "The erotic poker is not worthy of speaking"

It seems that they don’t know that this is a debate. They cannot distinguish the difference between their inner thoughts and social reality. Once they find that there is a difference between the two, they will try to use violent means to change it.

These people not only want to inspect and control the pornographic items themselves, but also inspect and control those who defend on the grounds of the First Amendment - yes, the object of their inspection control has changed from an object to a living person, and in their opinion, all ideas and people that do not conform to their views should be carefully examined.

Edward had almost no choice but to know that Dworkin would have something to do, and that he knew that it would probably mess up the venue, but he still hoped that the organizer of the debate, Yale's Student Union, would at least be fair and not biased.

In fact, the conference attendants, including the host, were working hard to maintain order in the venue. However, unexpectedly, more than a dozen men and women suddenly poured in from outside the gate, waving bicycle chains in their hands, and they called themselves "bike dams"...

At that moment, Edward almost fell off the stage in surprise and used a bicycle chain as a weapon to hit people. Isn’t this what the gangsters in the alley often do back then?

Why do women in the United States thousands of miles away also play this game?

But the sudden entry of these guys has brought the dawn of solving the problem...

Due to Edward's concerns, he communicated with the conference organizers in advance and asked the latter to strengthen security measures at the venue.

The staff at the student union felt it was very reasonable. Dworkin's words and deeds caused great controversy at Yale. She claimed to be a civil rights fighter, but everyone knew that the gap between her and Hansen was too big. Although the latter made the lawn smoky, it was just taking drugs, alcohol, sex, and not using violence, nor threatening the passing people. Dworkin, haha...

Usually, debates at this level do not even arrange special security guards to find a few students to volunteer and then deal with them.

At this moment, a small door opened next to it, and two dozen strong young men came out, wearing uniform black uniforms, each with poor eyesight.

What's particularly scary is that they still have...uh...nunchakus in their waists

As Bruce Lee became popular in the United States, the lethality and portability of nunchaku were also well known. Although it is necessary to undergo rigorous training to use it skillfully, it cannot resist the thing looking handsome and deterrent. For a time, some states even listed it as a police weapon.

Of course, the organization was withdrawn soon after. For the extremely vicious crime, it is still the traditional American martial art - the fast-fire of the stand-alone pistol.

Faced with an opponent with the number of people and weapons, the bicycle dam team began to hesitate.

Bolton, who led the lead, shouted, what are you going to do?

The security captain was kind, "Do you have a vote?"

Bolton: “Are we here to support the feminist movement?”

Security Captain: "Do you have a ticket?"

Bolton: "Americans with conscience should come forward and support the women's movement!"

The security captain did not speak, and waved his hand and two burly men rushed out, knocking Bolton to the ground with quick hands and feet, then one carried his hand and the other, and threw him out of the gate in full view...

Then, the bicycle dam team came out like a scout, spontaneously exiting the auditorium.

This made the originally noisy environment of the auditorium better.

Seeing that the situation was not good, Dworkin immediately roared: "We must realize that as long as the pornographic hidden objects disappear, we will be free. We must destroy all pornographic products. Whoever stops us is our enemy. We must smash their heads at all costs!"

"If there is a law, we must use the law to destroy these dirty people and products. If there is no law, it would be even better. Let's do it! Of course, we must know that patriarchy will not allow us to do this, so they will definitely hide behind the law to discipline our behavior. Now I want to say fucking, do whatever we want, and destroy this sin!"

The host made another coercion and inducement, and the atmosphere on the scene was slightly stable. The host also warned Dworkin that it would be best to abide by the debate rules agreed in advance, otherwise he could only cancel the debate and unilaterally determine that Edward won.

Fortunately, the host is a woman, Dworkin's attacks are not effective 98% of them, and they are quite beautiful.

Edward began to express his views amidst boos:

What I support is that people have the freedom to choose for obscene pornography, which is protected by the First Amendment of the Constitution, that is, freedom of viewing is equally important as freedom of viewing.

The Constitution protects both.

This may seem unreasonable, but let's look at the rest of the world.

Many countries in the desert stipulate that women should not show their faces, and before that they banned all pornography, we can see that the two are actually complementary.

Moral precepts will become more and more strict, so strict that ordinary people can hardly imagine and accept, so instead of waiting until then, it is better to fully liberalize the government. The government no longer assumes the role of an appraisal officer and transfers this power. Social communities and organizations can promote their own ideas without violating the law and suggest whether the public needs to abandon certain publishing products.

I want to remind everyone that the more morals the guys in their mouths are, in fact, they are indeed working hard to cleanse the filth they think in the film and television programs.

This sounds good, but the standards are set by them, so once feminism falls into their standards, it is hard to escape the fate of being cleaned up.

Larry Parry, famous for the Memphis anti-pornographic rake, creatively sued Harry Remus, who thought he was presided over justice, maybe you… also think he was presided over justice.

But what you don't know is that before that, Larry Larry successfully prevented the release of a beautiful and highly artistic film about Les.

Have you seen it?

When executing universal moralism, no one will be spared.

What we believe in should be law, not morality.

Good law is the lower limit of society, while morality is the upper limit of society.

Of course we should strive to get closer to the upper limit, but have you ever thought that law is actually the greatest common divisor of this society, and everyone in society follows the recognized law, and the law is fixed with the endorsement of the government and the state.

On the contrary, morality, different people have different moral values, and it is very convenient to criticize others' immorality. At the same time, the emergence of moral courts has also increased this trend.

However, because moral standards do not have norms and generally recognized definitions, their connotation and extension can be arbitrarily expanded, and ultimately formed the morality of whoever has a higher tone. This is an extremely undesirable act from the perspective of social governance, because speech is free and has a moral advantage cannot be refuted, but if someone uses moral advantage to command others to act, it is really terrible.

Think about it, how did the prohibition come about?

Without Prohibition, there would be no Al Capone. Of course, those and groups who proposed Prohibition could use "I'm kind-hearted" to defend it.

Little do they know that the road to hell is usually paved with good intentions.

At the same time, I would also say that the last time Ms. Gloria James debated with me, she also admitted that “the long history of opposing pornographic laws has proven that these laws are often used against those who are heretical in politics or lifestyle.”

I would like to remind everyone not to forget the reality that if we Americans cannot maintain the current style of almost lawless and random behavior, then the prevailing one was definitely not the feminists, but the so-called conservative moralists in the south.

To be honest, you can make a public statement here today because it is New Haven, and New York is not far away. It is the most enlightened and lawless or the most morally degraded place in the United States. If you are really not satisfied with the moral atmosphere here, then I suggest you go on a trip to the south. I think life and reality will teach you to cherish and be grateful, rather than endlessly overturning the consensus that people have obtained through countless efforts according to their own wishes.

Believe me that once America falls into moral supremacy, the first thing they want to ban is Ms. Dworkin's book.

You think I'm lying.

Well, if you've watched TV three days ago, you should know about my symposium with the famous "moral nobleman" Reverend Tom McKe.

Everyone knows that he is the leader of the mainstream filming of orthodox morality in New England. He has always advocated that the government should crack down on yellow obscene materials without mercy.

It sounds like it is consistent with your demands?

I asked him on the show if he was willing to join forces with feminism like Boxer to sweep away yellow items?

The priest expressed welcome to anyone willing to join the war.

Then I asked him if his organization would choose to ban Ms. Dworkin Boxer's works if it had power.

Without hesitation, he returned to "I will immediately forbidden this kind of book that blasphemed God, which is necessary and justified."

Then the pastor may have discovered the trap of this problem - after all, I am a lawyer and set the trap is my specialty, and the pastor began to defend "You don't need to use pornographic items or feminist books to outline the dangers of this sin that prohibits publishing. You just need to read the Bible and understand."

I immediately reminded the pastor that the Bible itself is the most inspected and forbidden book in the world, as was the case in ancient times and modern times.

Then, instead of replying to me, the pastor found out the cross and the Bible. I felt that he was going to carry out an exorcism ceremony on me, and I thought that Salem (the place where the witch hunting case occurred) was also in this state, so I rationally decided to terminate the program.

You should know that one of the most dangerous trends in our era is to formulate a "hate speech" law to make truth-telling "socially unacceptable" or even "illegal".

And those who want to empty our pockets and want to harness us, have discovered a magical formula: encourage us to be jealous of others or be angry with others, so that we will continue to hand over our money and freedom.

‘Civil rights (movement)’ means treating everyone equally. But now some people are so accustomed to special treatment that equal treatment is regarded as discrimination.

...

Edward talked freely, this was the field he was best at, or the battlefield he was most familiar with.

Just as the Vietnamese Communist soldiers were elusive in the jungle of the Indochina Peninsula, Edward's wisdom and language talent were fully demonstrated at this moment, and good legal education gave him excellent logical thinking ability. His multiple appearances in court made him accustomed to facing big scenes. The more pressure he was on the other side, the more excited he was.

The muscles of the mind began to swell and gradually became quiet down. Most of the students present today were Yale students. They were not only not stupid but also had good intelligence.

As Lincoln said, you can deceive some people for a while, but you can't deceive everyone for a lifetime.

Although Edward did not name a name, he spoke sharply and pointed directly at the core issue of Dworkin - she was not fighting for feminism, but to seek women's privileges and override the law.

Of course, the United States does not lack privileged classes, but at least on the surface, these people have swear to absolutely respect the Constitution and everything is done within the framework of law and even morality.

This seems hypocritical, but it is this hypocrisy that has promoted the development of the American judicial system and civilization. When everyone starts to pay attention to eating, the cost of running society will be reduced. Of course, the privileged people will gain more benefits from it. However, at this time, due to the sufficient lubrication of the social system by law and morality, unarmed lower-level people can still follow behind and drink some soup.

On the other hand, when the privileged class tore off the veil of warmth and began to become extremely vicious in eating, the first ones who became food must be ordinary people at the bottom.

Everyone understands this principle, but they also know that the existence of the privileged class is inevitable - at least in capitalist society.

This is the equal rights movement. The equal rights movement itself eliminates the phenomenon of different rights in society, and combines the lower classes as much as possible to form a joint force to conduct a certain degree of checks and balances against the privileged class.

Of course, the privileged people are certainly unwilling to happen, but at this moment, the United States is booming, the people are full of energy, and the elite class has not yet completely fallen to the point of becoming a capital watchdog.

There is an extremely huge strategy behind the acquiescence and even promotion of the equal rights movement.

Faced with the ideological output of Eastern Red, the red regime does not recognize privileges at least in the lowest logic. This is more than one level higher than the basic logic of capitalism, and it also represents the more advanced and civilized thinking direction of mankind.
To be continued...