I accidentally read book reviews and saw something that made people laugh and ridiculous. I have to say it. I read the book ※‖△. I read it for 1 k and I feel that the commentator is very illiterate and impulsive (this person basically cannot understand more profound books and cannot distinguish right from wrong). It is also very funny. In his opinion, he is a bandit with a gun, and he doesn't know that the police also have guns.

Therefore, he derived a very evil conclusion from Spengler and the theory of civilization, that is, this book promotes anti-nationalism and other things. Like anti-nationalists, this book also mentions Spengler, mentions civilization evolution, mentions Shazi obeys the people, and mentions Islam..... 1. Read the book. ◇1. You must k_a read n books s︿hu―.

In fact, in fact, many times, it should not be so straightforward. The result is that it is revealed and sealed by someone. However, in order to prove his innocence, the opponents specially found one or two strategists to promote something. The purpose is not so much academic, but rather to make a move. From ancient times to the present, this trick is very common, but now it has changed its way of playing.

Because of this, the strategist was different from other civilizations in the world. The second round of life was that of the Battle of the Feishui to the end of the Qing Dynasty. 1 Read the book※  1 Why did they turn a blind eye? Because there were many copies of the Chinese direct descendants of Mr. Lei Haizong of Spengler and other warring state policy schools. He was just a little better to write novels like this than the rest of the country, but academics were barely qualified. Since he had read Mr. Lei's book, he naturally knew Mr. Lei's point of view: Chinese civilization has its own special nature. Since she could have the second round of life (the Battle of the Feishui at the end of the Qing Dynasty), there was naturally the possibility of the third round of life. However, in order to oppose the present and inspire public opinion, the strategists turned a blind eye to it. Their conclusion was that civilization would end and a great disaster was coming.

After reading a lot of book reviews, I was speechless to some readers. If you don’t like reading books, you can’t read them. No one forces you to do so. Really, but I don’t like books and can’t understand them, but I have to make a comment that is half-understanding, and confuses the world in the book with the utilitarian behavior of the strategist in the real world to show that you have foresight, which is ridiculous.

What the book wants to express is to use the most outstanding talents in modern times (although Mr. Lei Haizong is not in the protagonist's age, it is not impossible to advance his views ten years), and to use their knowledge and wisdom to find the third round of vitality for Chinese civilization. However, based on their views, Chinese civilization will not end, but will continue. I think this alone is enough to prove the difference between this book and the clerk.

If you talk too much, you will lose it. Then there is no end. In addition, the book review area is very chaotic. I originally wanted to appoint General Yuwen Tai as the moderator, but he is not a real name, so I would like to ask a moderator (remember not to argue with book friends, because arguments will bring greater disasters and resentment. Besides, it is normal for readers to complain, especially the book is very abused, and it is the initial tone of the troops. I'm sorry for them.)
Chapter completed!