There are only four color blocks in "time".

However, there are many perspectives where a specific "image" can be observed from a characteristic position.

The initial color block can be observed from four angles. The first is the door that is viewed in the forward direction, the second is the door that appears from right to left, on the left wall, the third is the window that is from left to right, on the right wall, and the fourth is the staircase that is close to the rear wall.

The second color block can also be observed from four angles.

The third, the fourth color block, Yago also found four angles.

Why are there four?

After repeatedly confirming that there was no omission of angles, Yago couldn't help but think about this.

Is there any special rule?

After trying one by one, each door passed through once, Yago ruled out the idea of ​​continuing to test with exhaustive methods.

Single, single attempt at a specific angle failed.

Then, it should be a sequence issue.

If he uses the exhaustive method to brute force, he doesn't know how many of the arrangement and combinations are.

It would be fine if each color block only needs to be passed through once, but if it is multiple plurals, then there are too many attempts.

After observing carefully for a long time, Yago still found no clues.

Thinking of the puzzle, the operation of trying to move the color blocks also failed-

The color block cannot be moved.

Without clues, Yago could only turn to another room.

but.....

He paused after he walked through the door of the room as he entered.

He is still in his original room:

"So that's it, is the entrance part of the options?"

Looking at the room composed of four colors: black, white and gray, Yago moved his position again and included the entrance when entering into the category of visual puzzle concepts.

In the end, the result he came to—

There are five color blocks in total, and each color block can form five visually conflict-free and misaligned patterns.

There are 16 types of patterns for doors, stairs, windows, and other types of exits and passages.

The answer is the same as before.

This conclusion silenced Yago.

After an additional alternative, the quantity has not changed?

Yago seriously considered whether he had been affected by any cognitive aspects.

After careful consideration, he thought about the key to the problem.

The images he put together only calculates the situation that includes a color block.

If other color blocks are included and the pattern is formed, he will choose to reconstruct.

It's not a difficult problem to find.

but.....

"The workload has increased."

It is similar to the problem of order arrangement and combination. There is a difference in the composition of color blocks and the number of compositions of only one and multiple colors for a certain color.

There is no way, Yago can only visually combine color blocks again.

After repeated confirmation, he got 36 results.

5 color blocks, 36 composition channels.

“One more?”

The number of compositions of a single "time" color block before could be divisible, but after composition of composite color blocks, it could not be divisible.

But is this a rule?

A puzzle with the rule of "whether to divide"?

Could it be a bit too simple?

As he was about to believe and doubt, Yago walked towards a color block.

Color blocks of doors at the entrance.

There are five others, only six doors.

Moreover, most of the other color block compositions are similar, basically all compositions such as doors, windows, and stairs.

In the pattern of the color blocks at the entrance, there is a composition of a "frame" constructed together with another color block on the side.

This "frame" is not composed of other single or multiple color blocks.

Temporarily, Yago walked towards this wall, this pure white painted paper without the pattern.

Almost the moment he touched the picture, although the scene in front of him did not change, his perception of the previous "time" color blocks disappeared.

Turning around, Yago saw a pure white space.

In this space, there is only a lonely table and chair made of pure white luster.

On the table, there is a book.

When he saw the book, Yago couldn't help but take out the thin notebook he had just obtained from the basement.

After a little pause, he walked towards the table. After hesitatingly thinking about whether to sit in a chair or stand, he chose to stand at the table and picked up the book on the table.

[It really failed.]

[Although I was not surprised, what is the reason?]

[Although the habit of making mistakes is reflected in the development of many intelligent life, without exception, some of these mistakes will be corrected.]

[The wizards who study bloodline all have a conclusion, that is, life tends to be simplified and complex.]

[In order to reduce consumption, life will choose to simplify unnecessary processes. However, because simplification itself is consumed, the more simplified it, the greater the subsequent consumption is needed. Therefore, simplification often does not come to an end, but stops in the middle.]

[The same is true for the trend of complexity. Complexity based on the goal of "stability" will also lead to complexity not coming to an end due to excessive consumption thresholds.]

[The sources of complexity and simplification are both life instinctively pursues efficiency in order to maintain survival, but the increase in efficiency consumption will suppress efficiency]

[Life is like this, and consciousness formed based on carriers will also follow this basic logic.]

[However, because of the existence of 'simplification', life makes wrong decisions because of the loss of information, resulting in various non-efficient and anti-efficient behaviors.]

[Sensibility is the fruit of error?]

[How should this basic logic and this underlying logic be corrected?]

[Can the underlying architecture of non-mirror units improve this situation?]

[How much impact can the external environment have on life decision-making?]

[Under the instinctive consciousness of self-protection, how many shirk responsibility will life make, and how many chain reactions will it bring about under such a wrong understanding?]

[What if the carrier is completely separated and the consciousness exists independently?]

[Can consciousness exist independently?]

[The wizard's exploration is still too shallow.]

[The elves' exploration of consciousness, cognition, and time is far beyond ours.]

[However, they also made wrong decisions and chain reactions because of their self-protection, which caused their civilization to collapse.]

[Is it wrong to protect yourself?]

[No, this is a logical fallacy, a single attribution error.]

[There are also errors in defining vague definitions.]

[The correct source will export the wrong fruit.]

[The correct source will separate conflicting buds.]

[Whether it is flesh and blood life or high-level consciousness, there may be two positive and negative sides in every link...]

[It's really annoying underlying logic, why is it "both and reverse"?]

[A thing is multi-faceted. ‘correct’ should not have only one face, and ‘error’ should not have only one face.’]

[Real and wrong are simplified extreme classification methods.]

[The right and right may be harmonious, non-conflicting, or contradictory. There may be a coexistence between mistakes and right, and the same should be true between different mistakes.]

[It's my problem, maybe the most important thing I should do is to correct my underlying logic.]
Chapter completed!