I was preparing to update in the morning, and I saw a book friend in the discussion area posting a post saying that I would cheer me up, and that this book is the best modern article so far and I don’t want it to die.

I dare not take it as the best modern text to date. At least I personally think that if "Linggao Qiming" can be considered a modern text, it is definitely better than me. Dozens of characters are all vivid, and the richness of the material that the Sugar Industry Guild and Land Reform sections of the portrayal of characters and the social class mastery is not comparable to that of me. Scr is definitely much better than me. The writing skills of "Ususing the Qing Dynasty" and the readability and mastery of historical materials at that time are beyond my reach. The only thing I can do better than the Oscars is to write honestly, have fewer social activities, do not make random mistakes, be honest, and do not write blank checks or cheat monthly tickets. However, a few people in the discussion area have said this, and there are also a few who have spent a lot of effort to write posts worth hundreds of words, which shows that this book is a good book.

But what about the results of this book? Clicks, popularity, recommendation tickets, rewards, and collections. I can tell you: 2250, this number can only be said to be unsatisfactory at most. In Chuangshi, it is only 70-100 (if I did not overestimate myself), and in history, it is only 15 or 6. I have no motivation to ask the editor for this score, and it has a considerable impact on the buyout price of my next book (if Chuangshi is willing to buy out for me). A book called "the best modern article so far" by some people, but only this score is only. Isn't this ironic?

I just saw the ‘Reporter’ rewarded me with 100 gold coins. I am very grateful, but I just want to say, why can’t these 100 gold coins appear in June? It was more useful to me at that time? Why do people who think this book are good are unwilling to spend a few dollars, or find ways to increase their user level to vote for a few recommendation votes? If you are unwilling to do so, advertise for me outside and recommend this book more? If the book has five thousand, seven thousand collections, and the popularity of one thousand five thousand a day is 1,500 or two thousand, I believe the editor will buy me out of the contract, and even if the price is lower, I am willing to continue writing. I hope that some readers who see the book will read it, so that everyone will be fine.

Unfortunately, the result is not like this. In fact, the relationship between readers and authors is very simple. When we write books carefully and produce good works, readers will give us corresponding financial rewards. However, due to the particularity of online literature, only some readers pay, while others can ride free rides. Moreover, these people are used to free rides, and they take this for granted, and even think that this free ride is also a support for me. This situation has led to only those authors with a strong tendency to pay for readers to survive. I happen to be the type of reader group with a less-inclined reader group. Weber is not the type of writer who is willing to get dozens of yuan, hundreds of yuan a month, and so eunuchs are taken for granted.

Finally, Weber sincerely apologizes to readers who have enthusiastically supported this book with practical actions. No matter what, I owe you this book to eunuchs. As for other people who think this book is not bad but have not taken much action, I can only say that I am very sorry.
Chapter completed!