There is a problem with the choreography. The choreography is very old-fashioned, and the actors' dancing is either too bad or too good.

The camera focuses on the shoes for close-ups, which is very creative.

The opening narrative is smooth and the audience is immediately drawn into the plot..."

After Ronald finished writing it, he read it again and found it a bit contradictory.

The filming of this movie is very strange. In some parts, it looks like a very experienced director who has been making movies for decades. In other parts, the filming is very jerky, like when I was filming "Fast Pace", I was a fledgling film director.

Also, is this a high-concept or low-concept movie?

As far as actors are concerned, none of them are famous, so they should be considered suitable for high-concept movies. But the plot is not high-concept at all. Dancing is not allowed in the town. What era is this?

If he hadn't read the story written by the author Pitchford, Ronald would have thought it was a made-up story.

"Wait..." Ronald suddenly discovered his misunderstanding.

This is indeed a high-concept movie, but it is not for young people like me who have settled in big cities, but for tens of millions of small-town youth living in small towns.

Religion and conservative forces are strong there, and the people's lives are not much different from those a few decades ago. They go to church on weekends to listen to pastors' sermons, and there are no new things like disco bars and rock concerts.

Dancing those dance steps that combine ancient and modern dances is a very outrageous behavior for them.

This is why the director used some old-school editing techniques. Those small-town youths, probably like his hometown in Staten Island, would have to wait a year or two before they could see "ET" and "Fast-paced Alien".

A deviant movie like "Chimon High School".

What they are familiar with is the old and slow editing rhythm of the 1970s. Maybe some movie theaters are still showing "Singin' in the Rain".
Chapter completed!