Font
Large
Medium
Small
Night
PrevPage Index    Favorite Next

Chapter 643 Protection of the First Amendment(2/2)

came up with a genius solution.

"Things went very well." Lindsay came in and quickly picked up a glass of water and drank it, then placed various legal documents in front of Ronald.

"I don't understand, just tell me..."

"This is a new theory on the intellectual property rights of movie stars, called the theory of intellectual property personification..."

Lindsay explained this theory. Specifically, for a profession like a movie star whose income is highly linked to personal image, the right of image is closely related to personal privacy and personal dignity, so this right cannot be viewed solely from the perspective of economic incentives.

According to the "personification theory", Kim Basinger's right of image should not be simply classified as transferable property because it involves personal identity and dignity.

Because the right of publicity involves personal privacy and personal freedom protected by the First Amendment, it cannot be seized or mortgaged to a third party like other property... This is equivalent to two of the most authoritative law school expert professors in America.

Legally speaking, it denies the power claims of the Lynch father and daughter and Mainline Pictures.

Moreover, without waiting for an appeal, after Lindsay introduced the case involving Kim Basinger to two leading professors on the First Amendment at Harvard and Yale, they also agreed to publish the article in an authoritative legal research journal.



Mainline Pictures and the Lynches are trying to control whether Basinger can take on certain film and television roles, and even require disclosure of her future plans, such as whether she plans to have children. These demands are all changes to Basinger's First Amendment

A serious violation of legal rights.

In addition, the so-called independent supervisor who comes to "help" Basinger make decisions about which movies to take on is similar to "forced labor", which means that the creditor is trying to limit her career choices, which conflicts with the protection of the Thirteenth Amendment.

.

In this way, once these two interesting legal articles are published, there will be no circuit court judge in America who will risk his reputation of opposing both Harvard and Yale professors and rule against Kim Basinger.
Chapter completed!
PrevPage Index    Favorite Next