Although the two continents in the east and west of the world, the two continents are everywhere, the continental plates are very close. The two continents are the closest places since their geographical reasons, since the original time, they have been port cities that communicate with the east and west continents. They are restricted by the network and gods and are above the humanity. When the gods look down on them, which wizard dares to violate them? Which wizard has the ability to violate them?

As for the gods, if you want to do whatever you want, please don’t do your freedom in the land bound by law. In fact, reaching the level of gods, you have long lost the thoughts of many mortals. The interests of mortals are not in their eyes, and they all understand the clergy and their wills are condensed, so they will naturally not do anything wrong. When they join the Pantheon, Winster will also give them a share of the principle of law, mostly just laughing it off. They do not need to violate all the orders in the law, and they are also disdainful to violate them. For the gods, the benefits of humanity are also their benefits. How can they destroy their fundamental benefits?

The order determined by the law is not entirely strict, and everyone is more beneficial to rigorous. Those who violate the law will be severely punished. Those who abide by the law will benefit their own benefits. All classes of order can be circulated, and the upward paths from the upper and lower reaches will give everyone a full freedom of choice. The fundamental law is actually a principle, and it is impossible to cover everything. However, any law formulation will follow this principle and act.

The debate on the interests of individuals and collectives also has its principles in the fundamental law published explicitly. When people face similar choices of saving people and not saving people, the law stipulates that those who save people are rewarded because this is beneficial to humanity, but if they do not save them, they are not punished. This is still a respect for personal choice. If you save people, I praise you. Although your behavior of not saving is not worthy of advocating, it is not a mistake. At this time, someone may say that you are using money to buy morality, but it is not.

In fact, it is precisely because in the main world, similar laws were already two thousand years ago, and the initial Confucianism also advocated this behavior. During the Spring and Autumn Period, Lu had such a law. Anyone who traveled to other countries and saw that someone from Lu became slaves could raise money to redeem him first, and then go to the government to reimburse him after returning to Lu. The government used the money from the treasury to pay the ransom and gave him a certain reward.

At that time, Confucius' disciple Zigong saved people but did not ask for rewards and did not go to get money. As a result, Confucius came to him and told him that this was wrong. People like him who have status and morality followed him. With more people like this, similar morality has been formed. Many people will think, "Oh, if I save people and still want money, it is immoral." For rich people, this little money is nothing. Spending some money is moral, but what about people without money? If you want money after saving people, it is immoral. If you don't have money, you will lose a lot of money. What should you do? Most of the time, you have to choose not to save people. There are fewer and fewer people who save people. Who will save people then save people?
Chapter completed!